The gaming business is one of those that has always been flourishing, with the number of people who play video games increasing all the time, to the point that you can now make money by playing games.
The gaming business is one of those that has always been flourishing, with the number of people who play video games increasing all the time, to the point that you can now make money by playing games. Every few months, the gaming business introduces new games in order to increase profits. Today, we’ll compare two of the most popular battle royale games, Free Fire and Call of Duty, so let’s get started.
With large numbers of players, Free Fire and Call of Duty mobile are two of the most popular battle royale games in the globe. We can say that the two games are extremely comparable in terms of gameplay. Both games have a similar premise in that numerous players battle each other until only one man/team remains. However, other from the same principle, both games have significant differences in terms of character, vehicle, and game types. Let’s have a look at the differences and see which one is better.
Revenue and the publisher
Fire is unrestricted (Garena free fire)
Garena or free fire Free Fire is a battle royale game for low-end mobile phones or Android devices, created by 111 Dots Studio and distributed by Garena for Android and iOS. It was launched globally on September 30, 2017. One of the most downloaded games of 2019 was steadily climbing its way to the top.
Mobile version of Call of Duty
Call of Duty is a popular first-person shooting game that almost everyone has played at least once in their lives. TiMi Studios developed the game and Activision published it for Android Wala games and iOS. It was officially launched on October 1, 2019 globally. Call of Duty: Mobile received over 148 million downloads globally, generating almost US$54 million in sales. In only three months, the game received over 180 million downloads, making it the most downloaded game of 2019.
Gameplay and prerequisites
Free Fire is less in size, with a total size of roughly 600MB after installation and a minimum RAM need of 1GB, but Call of Duty Mobile is bigger, with a total size of around 1.5GB after installation and a minimum RAM requirement of 2GB and above. The reason for this is because the mobile version of Call of Duty has more features than Free Fire.
In compared to Call of Duty, the number of participants in free fire is lower; just 50 people compete in a single round. Meanwhile, 100 players will participate in a Call of Duty battle. Free Fire only allows you to play from a first-person viewpoint, but Call of Duty mobile allows you to play from a first-person or third-person perspective.
Graphics and audio
As we all know, Free Fire is far smaller in size than Call of Duty, and as a result, the visuals in Free Fire aren’t as good; they seem cartoonish and aren’t as clear.
Call of Duty visuals, on the other hand, are more realistic and of higher quality. Furthermore, in compared to free fire, the mobility in Call of Duty mobile seems to be smoother.
The sound quality of free fire is not as good, and the sound of weapons shooting is not as realistic as in Call of Duty mobile, which is much better and more realistic, and sounds like a genuine combat.
The characters in Call of Duty wear realistic-looking army and vet outfits. Characters from Free Fire, on the other hand, have distinct clothing. Players in Call of Duty: Free Fire may also bring their pets into combat, which is a feature not accessible in Call of Duty: Mobile.
It goes without saying that Call of Duty mobile has more realistic visuals and sound than Free Fire, which is why Call of Duty wins Free Fire in the graphics and sound department.
Weapons And Characters
Let’s move on to the next Free Fire and Call of Duty comparison, which is characters and weaponry.
Both the free Fire and Call of Duty games allow you to pick from a variety of characters. Distinct characters have different responsibilities in Call of Duty, such as medic, scout, or defender, while characters in Free Fire have unique or special powers that may be improved later in the game. However, the mechanisms of both games are somewhat different. In Call of Duty, all characters are human and have no special abilities. While certain fictional characters, such as Wukong, who can transform into a bush, appear in Free Fire. As your level rises, you get access to additional players.
Let’s discuss about firearms now. The weapons in Free Fire seem to be superior than those in Call of Duty. Furthermore, Free Fire gives players with an Auto-aim system in which the aim point becomes red when you aim at the correct target, making it easier for players to strike the target. When players know when to shoot, it seems like a trick. To provide gamers a better gameplay experience, Call of Duty Mobile has included several new elements such as heavy weaponry and helicopters, comparable to the Payload mode in PUBG Mobile.
Let’s take a look at another distinction between Free Fire and Call of Duty Mobile: maps. Maps are incredibly vital in Battle Royale games for a better gameplay experience. Players in Call of Duty: Mobile are only given one map. However, the Battle Royale mode in Free Fire contains three maps: Kalahari, Purgatory, and Bermuda. However, the maps in Free Fire are designed for just 50 people, which is why they are smaller, but the maps in Call of Duty are significantly bigger, allowing for 100 players to battle on them. Both games’ features, including as weaponry, maps, vehicles, and costumes, are updated on a regular basis for a better gaming experience.
These are some of the most significant differences between two of the most popular Battle Royale apps, Free Fire and Call of Duty Mobile, that will help you choose which is superior to the other.